DBAC DBAC DBAC DBAC
  • Dansk BørneAstma Center
    • Om DBAC
    • Beliggenhed
    • Fonde og donationer
    • Persondatapolitik
  • Børneastma
    • Generelt om astma hos børn
    • Asthma hos små børn
    • Astma hos større børn
    • Generel astma behandling
    • Astmabehandling småbørn
    • Astmabehandling større børn
    • Undersøgelser
    • Gode råd
    • Litteratur til forældre
  • Allergi og eksem
    • Generelt om allergi
    • Mælkeallergi
    • Generelt om eksem
  • Kliniske studier
    • COPSAC 2010 (ABC)
    • COPSAC-Severe
    • COPSAC Acute (Antibiotika)
  • Video

Hyperventilation with cold versus dry air in 2- to 5-year-old children with asthma.

    Home Publications Hyperventilation with cold versus dry air in 2- to 5-year-old children with asthma.
    NextPrevious

    Hyperventilation with cold versus dry air in 2- to 5-year-old children with asthma.

    By Dansk Børne Astma Center | Publications | Comments are Closed | 1 februar, 2005 | 0

    Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2005 Feb 1
    Nielsen KG1, Bisgaard H.

    Abstract
    Cold air challenge (CACh) has been shown to discriminate between children with asthma and healthy young children. Hyperventilation with dry room-temperature air is a simplified alternative. We compared responsiveness in young children with asthma between two standardized, single-step protocols: dry air challenge (DACh) performed as 6 minutes of eucapnic hyperventilation with dry room-temperature air and CACh as 4 minutes of hyperventilation. Response was measured as specific airway resistance by whole-body plethysmography and expressed as change from baseline in numbers of within-subject SDs (SDw). The challenge sequence was randomly assigned. A comparator challenge was performed 1 hour later if the first challenge gave a change of 3 SDw or more. Forty 2- to 5-year-old children with asthma were included. Responsiveness to cold versus dry air showed significant, but weak, correlation (r(2) = 0.34, p < 0.0001), but responsiveness to CACh exceeded DACh (7.6 vs. 5.4 SDw, p < 0.02). CACh seemed to induce reduction in response to the following DACh (p < 0.01), whereas no such reduction was seen after DACh.

    CONCLUSION:
    Responsiveness to CACh exceeded responsiveness to DACh, and CACh seemed to induce refractoriness in contrast to DACh, probably because of the additional stimulus from airway cooling. This finding suggests CACh as the preferred method of challenge.

    PMID: 15542794

    No tags.
    NextPrevious


    KONTAKT

    DBAC
    Dansk BørneAstma Center
    Herlev og Gentofte Hospital
    Telefon +45 3867 7360
    kontakt@dbac.dk
    DBAC • Herlev og Gentofte Hospital • Danmark © 2023
    • 20200227-P4-morgen-Rikke
    • Astma hos skolebørn
    • Astma hos små børn (Bisgaard)
    • COPSAC Acute (Antibiotika)
    • COPSAC informationsaften
    • COPSAC-Severe
    • Dansk BørneAstma Center
      • ABC-DK
      • Forebyggelse
      • Forskning
      • Forskningscentre
      • Generelt om allergi
      • Generelt om eksem
      • Input fra COPSAC familier
      • Knud har tabt pusten
      • Metoder
      • Nyheder
      • Om astma
        • Generel astma behandling
          • Astmabehandling småbørn
          • Behandling af astma hos større børn
        • Generelt om astma hos børn
          • Asthma hos små børn
          • Astma hos større børn
        • Gode råd
        • Undersøgelser
      • Om DBAC
        • Beliggenhed
        • Bestyrelsen
        • Fonde
        • Hjælp os med at hjælpe
        • Jobs
        • Kontakt
        • Litteratur til forældre
        • Patient- og lægeorganisationer
        • Persondatapolitik
        • Sponsorer
      • Spil
      • Undersøgelser
      • video
    • FAVORIT
    • Forebyggelse af astma hos børn (TEST-tilmelding)
    • Forebyggelse af astma hos børn (TEST)
    • Hans Bisgaard
    • Hans Bisgaard nekrolog
    • Indeklima og sundhed på Bellahøj
    • Lokale steroider for børn med astma
    • Mælkeallergi
    • myter og fakta om børneastma
    • Persondatapolitik
    DBAC